Why 77% of New Veterinarians Are Women

Are women in veterinary medicine in it because of the flexible schedule? That's what Claudia Golden, Harvard University economist, seems to believe. Golden recently delivered a speech at the American Economic Association in Atlanta where she argued that 30 years ago, women were only a "trivial fraction" of veterinarians and now make up nearly 77% of new veterinarians. She credits much of this growth to the fact that veterinary medicine allows for part-time or flexible schedules and has lighter residency requirements than that required for physicians (although equal in prestige). Because women are often willing to trade pay for better hours, many women that would have pursued careers as physicians are also now becoming veterinarians. Her research has revealed that 15 years after graduation that in women with children: 23% of MBAs weren't working vs only 3% of MDs. With business hours for MBAs typically ranging from 9 to 5 and often much longer, veterinary medicine allows women to "have it all" if they so desire: family and career, rather than family OR career.
But is this really the reason that veterinary medicine has become so popular with women? An equally valid argument is that these women are drawn to healing animals and enjoy the sciences - not that they are picking a career based on the feasibility of procreating and still maintaining a career. After all, would a woman who applies to business school really be the same type of person who applies to veterinary school -- is this woman really choosing a career in health care over business because of the "better" schedule? Perhaps the reason for the drastic rise in numbers is that women are finally able to pursue the careers that were once the almost exclusive domain of men.
One fact remains certain though: with 77% of new veterinarians being women, this spells change for the profession overall. For better or worse, women are entering the field and leaving it (many to come back only part time) when they decide to have families. Is this a victory for women or a potential issue for the profession?
What are your thoughts? Read the full article published in the Wall Street Journal here.








